AI leadership consultancy for schools

Human decisions in an AI age

Clear recommendations. Practical next steps

Decisions in Practice helps school leadership teams understand what AI changes, decide what matters for their school and turn those decisions into clear, workable practice.

Start a conversation

Initial conversation · 25 minutes · Free

The issue

AI is already part of how students learn. It can also make learning harder to see

Students use AI to explain concepts, answer questions, summarise information, get started and create revision material. These uses can support learning. They can also replace some of the thinking and practice students need to do themselves.

Teachers use student work to judge what a student knows and can do independently. AI can make that harder to see.

What students can produce

AI can make finished work more sophisticated than the learning underneath it.

What students need to do themselves

AI can support learning, but it can also remove thinking or practice the task was designed to develop.

What teachers can trust

Where work is used to judge understanding or progress, schools need to know whether it is reliable enough for that purpose.

79%

of 13 to 18-year-olds said they had used generative AI.

Source: National Literacy Trust, 2026.
73%

of secondary teachers thought their students had used generative AI to help with homework in the previous month.

Source: Department for Education, Technology in Schools Survey 2024 to 2025.

The issue is not simply whether students use AI. It is what that use means for learning, practice and the evidence teachers rely on.

How Decisions in Practice works

A different approach

Start with the decision, then test what the response depends on

Schools can introduce a rule or process that looks clear but still depends on students or staff doing something the school cannot reliably see or check. A School AI Approach Review starts with the decision the school actually needs to make, then tests the realistic ways to respond.

Instead of

Should we ban AI for homework?

Start with

What is this homework for, what do students need to do themselves and when does the school need independent evidence?

A declaration only helps if
  1. 01

    Students report accurately

  2. 02

    Staff respond consistently

  3. 03

    The information improves the teacher’s judgement

From the first question to a clear recommendation

How the review works

The first step establishes the purpose of the activity, what students need to do themselves, where AI can support that purpose and what evidence the school needs to trust. The review then compares realistic options and tests what each depends on students and staff doing in practice.

  1. 01

    Get the question right

  2. 02

    Compare realistic options

  3. 03

    Test what each option depends on

  4. 04

    Check this against what the school knows

  5. 05

    Reach a clear recommendation

How schools can work with Decisions in Practice

Understand. Decide. Put into practice

Understand

AI: Don’t Panic

A leadership session about what AI can do, what it changes for schools, what needs attention now, what can wait and where decisions are needed. It is not a product demonstration or generic AI training.

Decide

School AI Approach Review

Flagship service

A focused review of one specific issue such as homework, assessment, student AI expectations, staff use or an existing policy. It brings together relevant guidance, the school’s context and realistic options, then gives a clear recommendation and practical next steps.

Put into practice

From decision to practice

Optional follow-on support to turn a decision into guidance, staff or student expectations, communication, changes to practice or policy.

Schools can start at the stage that fits their situation. This is not a compulsory sequence.

School AI Approach Review

What is a School AI Approach Review?

A focused review of one issue, such as homework, assessment, student expectations, staff use or an existing approach. It helps leaders apply relevant guidance to their context and agree clear recommendations and next steps.

A review might focus on
  • AI and homework
  • AI and assessment
  • Student AI expectations
  • Staff use of AI
  • An existing AI policy
You receive
  • ✓ A clear recommendation and why
  • ✓ Practical next steps
  • ✓ What needs to change
  • ✓ What the school should expect to see

The written document records the work. The real output is a clear way forward.

The leadership context

Schools need to be able to explain the decisions they make about AI

AI is already part of school life, but many schools are still working out what their position should be.

Guidance from organisations such as the Department for Education and the Education Endowment Foundation is useful. School leaders still need to decide what applies to their school and what to do next.

There is no shortage of AI guidance and information. The challenge is finding what is relevant, keeping up with what has changed and creating enough leadership time to work out what it means for the school.

Decisions in Practice brings the relevant material to the decision, rather than expecting leaders to piece everything together themselves.

“Our focus is, instead, on the quality of decision-making about AI.”

Ofsted

Inspection information for state-funded schools, 2026

The point is not that every school needs a detailed AI strategy or a new policy. It is that leaders are making important decisions while practice is changing quickly and the evidence is still developing.

Schools do not need to have every answer. They do need to be able to explain the decisions they make.

Mat Dodd, founder of Decisions in Practice
Mat DoddDecisions in Practice
About

School experience. An external perspective

I spent ten years teaching and working in school leadership, most recently as Director of Sixth Form. My experience includes academic and pastoral leadership, curriculum development, staff training and whole-school change.

I also found AI difficult to keep up with, with exciting possibilities and worrying stories competing with urgent work.

That first-hand experience shapes how I approach AI decisions. School leaders know their own context best. An external review adds a different perspective without being tied to the original proposal, an existing policy or the way the issue has previously been discussed.

Decisions in Practice is independent of AI platforms and vendors. There is no product to sell and no fixed view that schools should use more or less AI.

Contact

Start with a conversation

If your school is working through an AI-related decision, I’d be delighted to hear from you.

Tell me a little about the issue your leadership team is trying to resolve and I can let you know whether a School AI Approach Review could help.

Share as much or as little as you need. A short outline is enough to start.

Your details will only be used to respond to your enquiry and reasonable follow-up. See the Privacy Notice for information about how your details are handled.