AI: Don’t Panic
A leadership session about what AI can do, what it changes for schools, what needs attention now, what can wait and where decisions are needed. It is not a product demonstration or generic AI training.
Clear recommendations. Practical next steps
Decisions in Practice helps school leadership teams understand what AI changes, decide what matters for their school and turn those decisions into clear, workable practice.
Initial conversation · 25 minutes · Free
Students use AI to explain concepts, answer questions, summarise information, get started and create revision material. These uses can support learning. They can also replace some of the thinking and practice students need to do themselves.
Teachers use student work to judge what a student knows and can do independently. AI can make that harder to see.
AI can make finished work more sophisticated than the learning underneath it.
AI can support learning, but it can also remove thinking or practice the task was designed to develop.
Where work is used to judge understanding or progress, schools need to know whether it is reliable enough for that purpose.
of 13 to 18-year-olds said they had used generative AI.
Source: National Literacy Trust, 2026.of secondary teachers thought their students had used generative AI to help with homework in the previous month.
Source: Department for Education, Technology in Schools Survey 2024 to 2025.The issue is not simply whether students use AI. It is what that use means for learning, practice and the evidence teachers rely on.
Start with the decision, then test what the response depends on
Schools can introduce a rule or process that looks clear but still depends on students or staff doing something the school cannot reliably see or check. A School AI Approach Review starts with the decision the school actually needs to make, then tests the realistic ways to respond.
Should we ban AI for homework?
What is this homework for, what do students need to do themselves and when does the school need independent evidence?
The first step establishes the purpose of the activity, what students need to do themselves, where AI can support that purpose and what evidence the school needs to trust. The review then compares realistic options and tests what each depends on students and staff doing in practice.
A leadership session about what AI can do, what it changes for schools, what needs attention now, what can wait and where decisions are needed. It is not a product demonstration or generic AI training.
Flagship service
A focused review of one specific issue such as homework, assessment, student AI expectations, staff use or an existing policy. It brings together relevant guidance, the school’s context and realistic options, then gives a clear recommendation and practical next steps.
Optional follow-on support to turn a decision into guidance, staff or student expectations, communication, changes to practice or policy.
Schools can start at the stage that fits their situation. This is not a compulsory sequence.
A focused review of one issue, such as homework, assessment, student expectations, staff use or an existing approach. It helps leaders apply relevant guidance to their context and agree clear recommendations and next steps.
The written document records the work. The real output is a clear way forward.
AI is already part of school life, but many schools are still working out what their position should be.
Guidance from organisations such as the Department for Education and the Education Endowment Foundation is useful. School leaders still need to decide what applies to their school and what to do next.
There is no shortage of AI guidance and information. The challenge is finding what is relevant, keeping up with what has changed and creating enough leadership time to work out what it means for the school.
Decisions in Practice brings the relevant material to the decision, rather than expecting leaders to piece everything together themselves.
“Our focus is, instead, on the quality of decision-making about AI.”
Ofsted
Inspection information for state-funded schools, 2026The point is not that every school needs a detailed AI strategy or a new policy. It is that leaders are making important decisions while practice is changing quickly and the evidence is still developing.
Schools do not need to have every answer. They do need to be able to explain the decisions they make.

I spent ten years teaching and working in school leadership, most recently as Director of Sixth Form. My experience includes academic and pastoral leadership, curriculum development, staff training and whole-school change.
I also found AI difficult to keep up with, with exciting possibilities and worrying stories competing with urgent work.
That first-hand experience shapes how I approach AI decisions. School leaders know their own context best. An external review adds a different perspective without being tied to the original proposal, an existing policy or the way the issue has previously been discussed.
Decisions in Practice is independent of AI platforms and vendors. There is no product to sell and no fixed view that schools should use more or less AI.
If your school is working through an AI-related decision, I’d be delighted to hear from you.
Tell me a little about the issue your leadership team is trying to resolve and I can let you know whether a School AI Approach Review could help.